Longney, Geoff

Born:

Died:

Name Notes:

Comment:

Year	Team	Pl	Po	G
1957	Oakleigh	14	0	23
1958	Oakleigh	13	0	22
1960	Oakleigh	2	0	5
1961	Oakleigh	1	0	1
Total	Oakleigh	30	0	51
Total	Overall	30	0	51

Year	Representing	Round	Opposition	AheadBehind	OnfieldPosition	Played	Goals	Points	Comment
1957	Oakleigh	1	Port Melbourne	L	Unk	Y	1
1957	Oakleigh	2	Yarraville	L	Unk	Y	2
1957	Oakleigh	3	Camberwell	L	Unk	Y	1
1957	Oakleigh	4	Brighton	W	Unk	Y	1
1957	Oakleigh	9	Sandringham	L	Unk	Y	2
1957	Oakleigh	10	Box Hill	W	Unk	Y	2
1957	Oakleigh	11	Coburg	L	Unk	Y	3
1957	Oakleigh	12	Northcote	W	Unk	Y	3
1957	Oakleigh	14	Port Melbourne	L	Unk	Y	2
1957	Oakleigh	16	Camberwell	L	Unk	Y
1957	Oakleigh	17	Brighton	W	Unk	Y	3
1957	Oakleigh	18	Brunswick	L	Unk	Y	1
1957	Oakleigh	19	Preston	L	Unk	Y	1
1957	Oakleigh	20	Moorabbin (original)	L	Unk	Y	1
Total						14	23

Year	Representing	Round	Opposition	AheadBehind	OnfieldPosition	Played	Goals	Points	Comment
1958	Oakleigh	1	Dandenong	W	Unk	Y	1
1958	Oakleigh	2	Camberwell	L	Unk	Y	1
1958	Oakleigh	3	Brighton	W	Unk	Y	1
1958	Oakleigh	4	Moorabbin (original)	L	Unk	Y	1
1958	Oakleigh	6	Mordialloc	L	Unk	Y	3
1958	Oakleigh	7	Sandringham	L	Unk	Y	2
1958	Oakleigh	9	Camberwell	W	Unk	Y
1958	Oakleigh	10	Brighton	W	Unk	Y	2
1958	Oakleigh	11	Moorabbin (original)	L	Unk	Y	1
1958	Oakleigh	14	Sandringham	L	Unk	Y	2
1958	Oakleigh	15	Prahran	L	Unk	Y	4
1958	Oakleigh	17	Preston	L	Unk	Y	2
1958	Oakleigh	18	Northcote	W	Unk	Y	2
Total						13	22

Year	Representing	Round	Opposition	AheadBehind	OnfieldPosition	Played	Goals	Points	Comment
1960	Oakleigh	17	Port Melbourne	W	Unk	Y	2
1960	Oakleigh	18	Camberwell	W	Unk	Y	3
Total						2	5

Year	Representing	Round	Opposition	AheadBehind	OnfieldPosition	Played	Goals	Points	Comment
1961	Oakleigh	3	Yarraville	L	Unk	Y	1
Total						1	1

Many Games are reported in year by year lists even if the player did not play in the game. This can be a questionable record that is still to be determined, or may represent a newspaper record that the player did not play that game. Sometimes it is useful to know that the player was actually absent.